Sister of Maserati driver who dragged cop argues automotive should not be forfeited as he had given it to oldsters
SINGAPORE – A forfeiture listening to for a Maserati driver, whose automotive dragged a Traffic Police (TP) officer for larger than 100m in 2017, has been adjourned to Feb 27.
This after his sister suggested the courtroom docket on Wednesday that recalcitrant offender Lee Cheng Yan, 38, had pledged the automotive to their aged dad and mother they normally have been its de facto householders.
It was not talked about in courtroom docket when Lee had allegedly pledged the automotive to his dad and mother. The price of the automotive was moreover not talked about in courtroom docket.
Lee, who was earlier convicted and sentenced over different offences, along with driving whereas beneath disqualification, could have the luxurious automotive forfeited to the state following the listening to in February.
Under the Road Traffic Act, in cases of repeat offenders convicted of driving whereas beneath disqualification, the courtroom docket has to order the forfeiture of the automotive when the prosecution applies for it.
Addressing the courtroom docket on Wednesday, his sister talked about the family is supporting his two daughters in Japan.
Stressing that they don’t condone his offences, his sister talked about Lee had taken large loans from their dad and mother to settle his approved fees.
She moreover suggested District Judge Kamala Ponnampalam that their mother had pawned her jewellery to elevate money to help Lee.
The sister added that Lee had pledged the automotive to their dad and mother to repay his loans, nonetheless there have been no paperwork to present the pledge. “That was with the understanding that he wishes to pay them the moment the car is released… What he did is pledge the car to repay the loans he had taken from (our) parents,” she talked about.
“While my brother legally owns the vehicle, the fact that he has pledged the proceeds of the vehicle to return my parents the money – we can argue (that this fact) makes my parents the de facto owners of the vehicle.”
Deputy Public Prosecutor Timotheus Koh had requested for the adjournment so that Lee and his sister could have further time to manage their submissions on points involving the attainable forfeiture.
The DPP moreover talked about checks wished to be made to decide if there are credit score rating firms linked to the acquisition of the automotive.
When approached by The Straits Times later, Lee’s sister declined extra comment.
Lee, who’s now serving his jail sentence and isn’t represented by a lawyer, turned up in courtroom docket in his purple jail outfit.
He suggested the courtroom docket he hoped to be given a chance to “claim back” the automotive.
He was earlier dealt with in courtroom docket over two items of proceedings.
He was beneath a driving ban on Nov 17, 2017, when he was stopped by a TP officer in Bedok Reservoir Road for not carrying a seat belt.
While the officer was standing subsequent to the driving pressure’s door, Lee abruptly reversed the automotive, then accelerated forward.
The policeman was dragged alongside Bedok Reservoir Road when his uniform acquired caught throughout the door on the driving pressure’s aspect. When the officer fell onto the freeway, Lee sped off with out serving to him.
In July 2020, he was sentenced to 4 years and seven months’ jail and a $3,700 prime quality on a quantity of prices, along with voluntarily inflicting grievous hurt to a TP officer. He was moreover given a lifetime driving ban.
While Lee was on bail pending his attraction in opposition to his conviction and sentence, he repeatedly drove a BMW rented by one in each of his mates.
He was handed further prices for guests offences. In one incident on March 12, 2021, he drove by means of a police roadblock, drove dangerously by dashing at 140kmh and ran two crimson lights.
In January 2022, Lee was sentenced to a special jail time interval of 1 12 months, 9 months and 16 weeks. He was moreover ordered to pay a $1,000 penalty over graft prices.
On Jan 18, 2023, he pleaded with a High Court select to in the reduction of his sentence totalling larger than six years.
Lee repeatedly talked about he was remorseful for what he had carried out and requested for leniency so that he could reunite collectively along with his daughters earlier.
Lee moreover requested for his automotive to not be forfeited, saying he wished to make use of the product sales proceeds to supply for his kids.
Justice Aedit Abdullah rejected Lee’s attraction and chided him for not finding out his lesson, together with: “You don’t seem to understand the seriousness of what you have done.”
This article was first revealed in The Straits Times. Permission required for copy.